“Is this property affected by meaningful mining risk?”
One of the things I’m proudest of is the additional contextual review process we built into the report.
Rather than relying solely on blunt automated pass/fail logic, flagged cases are reviewed using surrounding property context, geological interpretation and mapping analysis before outcomes are finalised. These “eyes on” checks are undertaken by a geotechnical specialist, usually the infamous Tom Backhouse, whose insistence on technical rigour has been instrumental in shaping the product.
The result is significantly fewer unnecessary failed reports while still maintaining a robust and defensible approach to risk.
The report also includes the Law Society licensed CON29M form, alongside broader mining interpretation and enhanced environmental context. That means firms can now confidently protect buyers against both environmental and mining risks without worrying whether something has been missed between disconnected workflows.
We’ve also backed the report with £1m loss of value cover across all mining types, because we believe if you stand behind a report, you should stand behind it properly.
What’s been especially rewarding throughout this process is how collaborative this launch has been.