But first, let us go back to the beginning.
CON29M began as the Law Society’s way to ask a single, consistent question:
Could coal mining affect this property?
Early versions of the form were text heavy and hard to apply. As Coal Authority (now Mining Remediation Authority) records were digitised, the search evolved into map led, property specific assessment that could pinpoint mine entries, shallow workings and a property’s subsidence history. For nearly two decades the form remained largely unchanged until 2018, when the Law Society permitted approved private producers to issue the official form. With the Coal Authority database available under licence, this drove competition, innovation and a step change in report quality.
Data was no longer only reported. It was interpreted with clearer actions and flags on which properties were at risk of subsidence, damage or loss of value associated with coal mining.
And yet many teams tell us the same thing: The report has flagged a risk, but it has not enabled my client to make a decision.
To understand the origin of that concern, it helps to know what the modern form actually asks.